<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Web Browser Shootout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tuxtweaks.com/2009/05/windows-web-browser-shootout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tuxtweaks.com/2009/05/windows-web-browser-shootout/</link>
	<description>Linux Tweaks, HowTo&#039;s and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:10:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linerd</title>
		<link>http://tuxtweaks.com/2009/05/windows-web-browser-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Linerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxtweaks.com/?p=482#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Both Safari and Firefox have a decent security reputation which may be unjustified. I believe the Mac with Safari was the first to fall in the most recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2941&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pwn2Own&lt;/a&gt; contest and Firefox wasn&#039;t far behind. &quot;Hi, I&#039;m a Mac. I got hacked in under 10 seconds!&quot;

The only browser to survive the hacking contest was Chrome. It sounds like &lt;a href=&quot;http://tuxtweaks.com/2008/09/10-ways-googles-chrome-browser-changes-the-web/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chrome&#039;s sandboxing technique&lt;/a&gt; is working.

All that being said, a chain is only as strong as it&#039;s weakest link. I think all of the browsers become vulnerable through insecure plugins like Flash. Thanks, Adobe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Safari and Firefox have a decent security reputation which may be unjustified. I believe the Mac with Safari was the first to fall in the most recent <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2941" rel="nofollow">Pwn2Own</a> contest and Firefox wasn't far behind. "Hi, I'm a Mac. I got hacked in under 10 seconds!"</p>
<p>The only browser to survive the hacking contest was Chrome. It sounds like <a href="http://tuxtweaks.com/2008/09/10-ways-googles-chrome-browser-changes-the-web/" rel="nofollow">Chrome's sandboxing technique</a> is working.</p>
<p>All that being said, a chain is only as strong as it's weakest link. I think all of the browsers become vulnerable through insecure plugins like Flash. Thanks, Adobe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmax</title>
		<link>http://tuxtweaks.com/2009/05/windows-web-browser-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxtweaks.com/?p=482#comment-122</guid>
		<description>So speed and rendering are compared.  

Should I have any concern with these browsers in terms of security?

Are there any other concerns for the casual web-surfer that might affect browser choice?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So speed and rendering are compared.  </p>
<p>Should I have any concern with these browsers in terms of security?</p>
<p>Are there any other concerns for the casual web-surfer that might affect browser choice?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmax</title>
		<link>http://tuxtweaks.com/2009/05/windows-web-browser-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxtweaks.com/?p=482#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Wow, I didn&#039;t realize how poorly I was being served until I read this post!

But, given the clever advertising, I am going to flush your recommendation and go ahead and click on the add to go to IE8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I didn't realize how poorly I was being served until I read this post!</p>
<p>But, given the clever advertising, I am going to flush your recommendation and go ahead and click on the add to go to IE8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

