<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Windows Web Browser Shootout</title> <atom:link href="http://tuxtweaks.com/2009/05/windows-web-browser-shootout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://tuxtweaks.com/2009/05/windows-web-browser-shootout/</link> <description>Linux Tweaks, HowTo&#039;s and Reviews</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 04:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: Linerd</title><link>http://tuxtweaks.com/2009/05/windows-web-browser-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link> <dc:creator>Linerd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:47:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxtweaks.com/?p=482#comment-123</guid> <description>Both Safari and Firefox have a decent security reputation which may be unjustified. I believe the Mac with Safari was the first to fall in the most recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2941&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pwn2Own&lt;/a&gt; contest and Firefox wasn&#039;t far behind. &quot;Hi, I&#039;m a Mac. I got hacked in under 10 seconds!&quot;The only browser to survive the hacking contest was Chrome. It sounds like &lt;a href=&quot;http://tuxtweaks.com/2008/09/10-ways-googles-chrome-browser-changes-the-web/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chrome&#039;s sandboxing technique&lt;/a&gt; is working.All that being said, a chain is only as strong as it&#039;s weakest link. I think all of the browsers become vulnerable through insecure plugins like Flash. Thanks, Adobe!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Safari and Firefox have a decent security reputation which may be unjustified. I believe the Mac with Safari was the first to fall in the most recent <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2941" rel="nofollow">Pwn2Own</a> contest and Firefox wasn't far behind. "Hi, I'm a Mac. I got hacked in under 10 seconds!"</p><p>The only browser to survive the hacking contest was Chrome. It sounds like <a href="http://tuxtweaks.com/2008/09/10-ways-googles-chrome-browser-changes-the-web/" rel="nofollow">Chrome's sandboxing technique</a> is working.</p><p>All that being said, a chain is only as strong as it's weakest link. I think all of the browsers become vulnerable through insecure plugins like Flash. Thanks, Adobe!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dmax</title><link>http://tuxtweaks.com/2009/05/windows-web-browser-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link> <dc:creator>Dmax</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:31:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxtweaks.com/?p=482#comment-122</guid> <description>So speed and rendering are compared.Should I have any concern with these browsers in terms of security?Are there any other concerns for the casual web-surfer that might affect browser choice?Thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So speed and rendering are compared.</p><p>Should I have any concern with these browsers in terms of security?</p><p>Are there any other concerns for the casual web-surfer that might affect browser choice?</p><p>Thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dmax</title><link>http://tuxtweaks.com/2009/05/windows-web-browser-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link> <dc:creator>Dmax</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:25:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxtweaks.com/?p=482#comment-121</guid> <description>Wow, I didn&#039;t realize how poorly I was being served until I read this post!But, given the clever advertising, I am going to flush your recommendation and go ahead and click on the add to go to IE8.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I didn't realize how poorly I was being served until I read this post!</p><p>But, given the clever advertising, I am going to flush your recommendation and go ahead and click on the add to go to IE8.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: tuxtweaks.com @ 2010-09-06 18:21:48 by W3 Total Cache -->